Infrastructure audit

Audit your LinkedIn architecture before handing prospecting to a server.

This checklist compares the risks of a VPS, Chrome extension, web app, and API/MCP orchestration so teams can choose the most controllable setup.

Audit points

Audit checklist

A VPS is not a sales or SEO strategy by itself. The audit should say whether the architecture makes actions more controllable, observable, and reversible.

Runtime
Where do LinkedIn actions run and which accounts can be touched?
List VPS, web app, local browser, API, n8n, and Make.
Controls
Which limits, approvals, previews, logs, and alerts exist before execution?
No sequence runs without a dry-run and reviewed sample.
Exit criteria
When should the team pause, exclude, move manual, or review the workflow?
Negative reply rate, repeated errors, or prospect pushback.

Verified facts

What the tool should clarify before being used.

Use case

A response to the BeReach VPS Audit gap, without bypass promises: the goal is to frame security, routing, logs, and guardrails.

Expected output

Runtime used: VPS, browser, extension, web app, API, or MCP connector.

Method proof

List VPS, web app, local browser, API, n8n, and Make.

Verification method

How to turn the template into an actionable step.

  1. 01 Runtime List VPS, web app, local browser, API, n8n, and Make.
  2. 02 Controls No sequence runs without a dry-run and reviewed sample.
  3. 03 Exit criteria Negative reply rate, repeated errors, or prospect pushback.

How it works

The VPS is not always the center

Dedicated infrastructure can add complexity if permissions, logs, previews, and limits are not clearer than a controlled web app or connector.

How it works

What to monitor

Track actions per account, errors, pauses, exclusions, negative replies, untreated CRM tasks, and signals left without an owner.