Yadulink / Documentation / LLM costs

Estimate AI cost before automating a LinkedIn workflow.

A profitable AI workflow is not judged only by price per token. You need to track call volume, context size, retries, human validation, and cost per useful action.

LLM costs

Cost per action, not only per token

The right operating unit is the cost of a useful prioritization, validated brief, or accepted draft. This prevents choosing a cheap model that creates too many corrections.

LLM costs

Compare quality and human validation

A more expensive model can be profitable if it reduces rework, targeting errors, and rejected messages. The test should track human validation rate, not only raw cost.

LLM costs

Set limits before volume

Each MCP workflow should have thresholds: budget per list, maximum call count, dry-run mode, logging, and automatic stop when quality drops.

Verified facts

What this documentation should make explicit.

Purpose

A profitable AI workflow is not judged only by price per token. You need to track call volume, context size, retries, human validation, and cost per useful action.

Workflow proof

The right operating unit is the cost of a useful prioritization, validated brief, or accepted draft. This prevents choosing a cheap model that creates too many corrections.

Assistant prompt

Estimate the cost of a Yadulink MCP workflow that triages LinkedIn leads, prepares briefs, and generates drafts, separating AI calls, context, human revisions, and budget guardrails.

Verification method

How to turn the guide into an operational test.

  1. 01 Cost calculation List AI calls per action: triage, summary, draft, scoring, audit, or enrichment.
  2. 02 Cost calculation Estimate context sent, output size, and number of leads processed.
  3. 03 Cost calculation Add error costs: retries, human revisions, and false positives.